By Robert Preidt
WEDNESDAY, Sept. 7, 2016 (HealthDay News) — Glycemic file values of the same foods can change broadly and may be an untrustworthy indicator of blood sugar response, agreeing to a unused study.
The glycemic index was made to appear how fast blood sugar rises after eating a specific sort of nourishment, the ponder creators said. It’s considered a device to assist individuals with diabetes control their blood sugar levels.
In the think about, researchers checked blood sugar responses in 63 solid grown-ups after eating the same sum of white bread three distinctive times over 12 weeks. The agents found that glycemic index values varied an average of 20 percent among individuals and 25 percent between diverse consider members.
“Glycemic record values show up to be an unreliable indicator even beneath profoundly standardized conditions, and are unlikely to be useful in directing food choices,” said lead creator Nirupa Matthan. She is a scientist at the U.S. Department of Agribusiness Human Nourishment Research Center at Tufts University in Boston.
“On the off chance that somebody eats the same sum of the same nourishment three times, their blood glucose reaction should be comparable each time, but that was not observed in our study. A nourishment that is moo glycemic file for you one time you eat it might be high the another time, and it may have no affect on blood sugar for me,” she explained in a college news release.
Based on these findings, Matthan said using the glycemic file wasn’t viable for nourishment labeling or in dietary guidelines at the individual level.
“On the off chance that your specialist told you your LDL [‘bad’] cholesterol esteem could vary by 20 percent, it would be the distinction between being typical or at tall hazard for heart illness. I do not think numerous people would discover that satisfactory,” she concluded.
The study was distributed Sept. 7 in the American Diary of Clinical Sustenance.